Subaru Forester Vs Mazda Cx 30
Subaru Forester Vs Mazda Cx 30 – At the Midwest Automotive Media Association’s recent spring meeting, we had the opportunity to compare two new products in the compact off-road SUV segment: the new 2023 Mazda CX-50 and the Subaru Wilderness. New 2022 Forest. With SUV access and off-road courses, it was a chance to see if the CX-50 and Forester Wilderness just talk the talk or if they can walk the walk.
It’s worth noting that the CX-50 we tested wasn’t the upcoming Meridian Edition, which has 18-inch wheels shod with different tires. Instead, it was the Turbo Premium Plus with 20-inch wheels and Goodyear Eagle Touring tires and an as-tested price of $43,170 (all prices include destination). At $36,015, the Forester Wilderness was less expensive. It had 17-inch wheels and Yokohama Geolandar wheels; they’re not the toughest off-road tires, but they do offer some off-road advantages over the CX-50’s on-road tires.
Subaru Forester Vs Mazda Cx 30
The CX-50 also has a ground clearance disadvantage — 8.6 inches compared to the Subaru’s 9.2 inches — and its handling, launch angles and cornering are also lower than the Forester Wilderness. The Subaru is also shorter in length and narrower than the CX-50, which didn’t make much of a difference in this particular terrain, but is generally an advantage.
Used Subaru Forester For Sale
At low highway speeds, the Mazda’s substantial output—256 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque on premium gas, compared to the Subaru’s 182 hp and 176 pound-feet—doesn’t make much of a difference, either. Although the Forester Wilderness shares its powertrain with other Forester models, it has unique transmissions that make it quick and responsive. In situations where the speed does not exceed 15 mph or so, the performance is not complete, and neither of these SUVs has a significant advantage when it comes to throttle response or pedal changes.
Both SUVs completed the off-road course, but the CX-50 produced more painful bumps and generally felt unhappy with bumps, rocks and roots on the track. Mazda launched the CX-50 as a safe SUV, but it’s only meant to take you on rough roads, and it showed. It did what we set out to do, but we complained all the way. The only noticeable advantage it had over the Forester Wilderness was the larger camera screen for the view ahead of you when descending.
Forester Wilderness, on the other hand, completed the course with ease. Where the CX-50 only has one off-road mode, the Forester Wilderness’s X-Mode all-wheel-drive system has more modes and feels more confident on rough terrain; Climbing hills isn’t easy, while the CX-50 pulls harder. The Forester Wilderness off-road suspension also handled bumps without irritating passengers.
The EV battery rating is based on the expected range of the current vehicle compared to the expected range of new vehicles. $
Mazda Cx 5
The two SUVs take different paths in their beauty. The CX-50 is great and, like all Mazdas, looks great inside and out – maybe a little.
Premium inside, at least in this iteration, as the interior doesn’t seem built to handle the inevitable problems that come with off-roading.
The Forester Wilderness, on the other hand, is in your face: it has waterproof upholstery and a rubber floor, and orange accents that don’t provide any utility but emphasize its off-road focus. Outside, its wrapped tires, lower suspension height and other badges do the same.
After all, the Forester Wilderness handles better off-road and looks to match. Although the CX-50 has also taken the course, it has faced some issues and its interior may not take as much abuse. Buyers who regularly venture off the beaten path will likely be more than happy with the Forester Wilderness, but those who do so infrequently may find the CX-50 more appealing thanks to its premium interior, advanced technology and sporty on-road handling. . experience (provided they are willing to pay a premium).
Subaru Forester And Mazda Cx 5 Comparison: Which Is Better?
The Editorial Department is your source for automotive news and updates. In accordance with our long-standing ethics policy, editors and reviewers do not accept gifts or free trips from car manufacturers. The editorial department is independent from the advertising, marketing and content sponsorship department.
Road Test Editor Brian Normile re-entered the automotive industry in 2013 and joined the editorial staff in 2014. Brian spent his childhood devouring every car magazine he could get his hands on – not literally, after all. – and now reviews and tests cars to help buyers make informed decisions. One day, Brian hopes to learn what to do with his hands when he sees a car on camera. He would drive an Alfa Romeo 4C every day if he could. Email Brian Normile
How does Hybrid work? January 17, 2024 Top 10 Stories of the Week: Mercedes-Benz GLE Costs More Than Toyota Highlander January 17, 2024 2023 Mercedes-AMG SL43 Fast Spin: Proof You Don’t Really Need a V-8 January 17, 2024
2025 Polestar 4 News Up Close: New ‘SUV Coupe’ Looks (Only) Ahead Mike Hanley January 11, 2024
Mazda Cx 5 Vs Subaru Forester Comparison
2023 Mercedes-AMG SL43 Spin Expert Review: Proof You Don’t Really Need a V-8 by Aaron Bragman, Detroit Bureau Chief
Expert Review 2024 Subaru Impreza Review: Joe Bruzek safe, efficient and sporty EdioJAKARTA Management, KOMPAS.com – PT Plaza Auto Mega (Subaru Indonesia) resmi mesararkan produk erihta, yakni All New Forester. A sports performance vehicle (SUV) to match the Mazda CX-30.
Nickname is balanced. Dari sagi kapasita mesin masih sama dan harganiya juga tidak jauh berbeda. Including the condition of both, yaitu SUV import utuh aka fully built (CBU) from Japan.
Soal desain, Forester lebih kental dengan shade off road. Ground clearance juga tinggi, 220 mm. Moreover, atapnya juga temasi dengan roof rail.
Ford Bronco Sport Badlands Vs. Mazda Cx 30 Turbo Awd Premium Plus
In Fiturnya, Subaru has a technologically advanced steering system called EyeSight. Meanwhile, Mazda uses the term Activsense. Fitur-fitur yang matilii masing-masing technology tersebut tak jauh berbeda.
The Forester consists of an 8-inch head unit and Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity, Push Button, Harman/Kardon sound system, sunroof and adaptive cruise control.
CX-30 juga can become soifang. The available head unit measures 8.8 inches and can be connected to a smartphone via Bluetooth. In addition, there is also a sunroof.
Dari mid-sector, Forester mid-seater Boxer 2.0 L, 4-sylder, no turbo. Mesin ini mampu produces tenaga hingga 154 tk at 6,000 rpm and a torque of 196 Nm at 4,000 rpm.
Subaru Outback Vs. 2021 Mazda Cx 5
While the CX-30, the middle Skyactiv-G 2.0 L, 4-sylder segaris, without turbo. Tenaga produces 153 torque at 6000 rpm and 200 Nm of torque at 4000 rpm. Tenaga tersebut disalurkan ke roda depan melalui transmission olamatis 6-percepatan.
For the price, Forester jauh lebih tinggi, yakni Rp 659, 5 juta (OTR Jakarta), status dengan CBU dari Jepang. Meanwhile CX-30, price Rp 539, 9 juta (OTR Jakarta).
Dapatan updates berita pehiliana and the latest news on Kompas.com. Available in the Kompas.com News Update group telegram, click the link https://t.me/kompascomupdate, then join. Then search Telegram terlebih dulu di mobile.
[POPULAR ] Segini Biaya Bikin Satu Bus Besar di Indonesia | Sopir Bus Maut di Tol Sumo Positif Narkoba, Ini Ancaman HukumannyaBrian Harper: What we have here, honey, is a Goldilocks situation, Mazda has decided that buyers will find its best-selling CX-5 crossover too big and the CX subcompact His -3 is too little. , the new CX-30 should be fine. I don’t know if that makes the CX-30 a super subcompact or a subcompact, but there you have it, a niche for a very popular segment. There are a lot of Mazda3s in this lineup, which makes the comparison with the Subaru Crosstrek all the more interesting. After all, the crossover, when it first came out in 2013, was actually a hatchback of the Impreza, following the second-generation model. So this is a big test of two car-based crossovers. First thoughts?
Mazda Cx 30 Vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Comparison Review
Nick Tragianis: I’m starting to feel déjà vu, maybe because we’ve just pitted the Mazda3 against the Impreza, albeit with a sedan flavor. But despite the obvious differences in body style, the terrain is very familiar – both the CX-30 and Crosstrek are comfortable, roomy, close in price and boast four-wheel drive. But like the Mazda3 and Impreza, dig a little deeper and the subtle differences become more apparent.
The main thing is the engine. The Crosstrek is powered by a 2.0-liter boxer four-cylinder with 152 horsepower and 148 pound-feet of torque. You can spec it with a six-speed manual or CVT, though our top-of-the-line Limited tester (equipped with EyeSight) was limited to the CVT. It’s a good combination; Subaru CVTs are generally smooth and well-tuned, and the Crosstrek is no different. When you hit the highway, let’s say, you get a little angry, but that’s part of the lesson for Subaru boxer engines. And like the Impreza, Subaru appears to have worked on the Crosstrek’s throttle body for 2020; now it is much easier, especially in the city. Unfortunately, my biggest problem
Mazda cx 5 vs subaru forester, compare subaru forester and mazda cx 5, mazda cx 30 vs, mazda cx 5 compared to subaru forester, mazda cx 3 vs subaru forester, subaru forester vs cx 5, subaru forester vs mazda cx 5 2015, mazda cx 50 vs subaru forester, subaru forester or mazda cx 5, mazda cx 30 vs subaru crosstrek, mazda cx 9 vs subaru forester, forester vs mazda cx 5
